<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Logically Equivalent Arguments · Maximum Mathematics</title><link>https://maximummathematics.com/books/foundational-mathematics/proof/logically-equivalent-arguments/index.html</link><description>Fundamentally, an argument is nothing more than a logical implication — a hypothesis (a conjunction of multiple premises) and a conclusion.
We’ve already seen that it’s possible to construct logically equivalent propositions using the laws of logic. Since an argument is fundamentally a proposition based on an implication, it should be possible to construct a different argument that’s logically equivalent to a given one. In some cases, this new, equivalent argument may be easier to verify than the original — which is exactly why it’s worth investing time in constructing logically equivalent arguments in the first place.</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><atom:link href="https://maximummathematics.com/books/foundational-mathematics/proof/logically-equivalent-arguments/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/></channel></rss>